Freedom of Media
Freedom of Media
Western Cape: Towards Constituting the Right2Know Campaign
Call for a Provincial Summit, Right2Know Western Cape.
Why a Provincial Summit?
The Right2Know is supported by hundreds of organisations and thousands of individuals across the country. Our rapid growth and mobilisation, culminating in a week of nationwide protest known as the Week of Action, has raised a number of questions about the Campaign's long-term scope, strategy, and structure. Where to from here? Is our mission over when the Secrecy Bill has been defeated? What should our strategy be for the months ahead? And what structure should we adopt as a mass-based, national campaign?
Who may attend?
Any organisation may send a delegation of up to two members to attend the summit and vote towards our resolutions. Additional members may attend as observers.
Refreshments and lunch will be provided. A voluntary registration fee of R50 is requested from anyone who is able to pay, to subsidise the transport and catering for unemployed delegates.
Time: 9am - 5pm
RSVP: Murray Hunter, E-mail: right2knowsa@gmail.com Tel: 0214617211
For more information concerning the dialogue questions on scope, strategy and structure, click here.
Event venue:Institute for Security Studies, Buchanan Square 160 Sir Lowry Road - WoodstockEvent start date:04/12/2010Strengthening ICASA - Ensuring The Authority Acts Courageously In The Public Iinterest
The SOS Coalition invites you to a workshop on “Strengthening ICASA - Ensuring it acts courageously in the public interest” to be held on the Wednesday 25th August 2010.
The aim of the workshop is to empower a pool of resource people to act as media spokespeople specifically on the topic of the ICASA Amendment Bill and broader ICASA issues. All are welcome but community media people are especially encouraged to attend.
A key focus of the workshop is looking at ways to ensure that ICASA is strengthened and given the necessary funding and capacity so that it is strengthened to act in the public interest. Critical to democracy and media freedom ICASA has been established as an independent constitutionally established body to, amongst others, “regulate broadcasting in the public interest” (ICASA Act 2000). However, recent moves by government have the potential to erode the independence and effectiveness of ICASA. The ICASA Amendment Bill grants new powers to the Minister.
The workshop aims to raise awareness on the issue of ICASA and its fundamental importance to strengthening an independent, accountable system. The workshop forms part of a larger campaign to raise awareness and educate people on key issues relating to ICASA.
The workshop will cover:
- What is ICASA? And why is ICASA so important?
- What is ICASA’s mandated role?
- The strengths and weaknesses of ICASA.
- The ICASA Amendment Bill - What is the Bill about? Strengthens and weaknesses of the Bill? What problems does the Bill pose for ICASA, its independence and effectiveness?
- The ICASA Amendment Bill and implications for community media.
The “SOS: Support Public Broadcasting” Coalition, Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) and the Institute for the Advancement of Journalism (IAJ).
Time: 09h00 – 12h00
Tea and snacks will be provided. Please note that space is limited.
Please RSVP - Prinola at prinolag@mma.org.za by 24 August 2010 13:00 pm.
Event type:WorkshopEvent venue:IAJ, 9 Jubilee Road, Parktown.Event start date:25/08/2010Event end date:25/08/2010The Freedom of impressions
On Saturday, I attended a workshop at Constitutions Hill organised by Congo Renaissance (CoRe), a platform of Congolese living in South Africa in commemoration of the World Press Freedom happening the following day, Sunday 3rd of May.
Worldwide the World Press Freedom day is considered as a day of action to encourage and develop initiatives in favor of the freedom of the press; a day to remind governments to respect their commitments to press freedom; and a day to alert the public and to increase awareness of the importance of freedom of the press.
The workshop aimed at assessing the state of freedom of expression and other human rights in the DRC and Zimbabwe and discussions on how civil society organisations and media professional could better contribute to fostering these rights in Southern Africa.
The continent of Africa has gone through good and worst scenarios. From a wide nationalist trend in the late 60s which leads to many African countries to independences; to states failure and dictatorship rise in 80s’ and 90s’. In the midst, major economic theories, financial adjustments and political re-structuring such as privatization, nationalisation, multipartism, national conferences have all been put to test. We have seen new leaders being put in place but still we can not justify or prove that citizens had expressed themselves freely and without any manipulation or intimidation.
With the Republic of South Africa leading the pack, the Southern African region may seems to be the most “democratic” since countries within the region had gone through processes of democratic elections. In last 15 years Angola, Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe and weeks ago South Africa, had national elections. However, as African, I have noticed that governments in many African countries are involved in what one may call “democratie de façade” or “fake democracy”.
It is a fact that in Africa even when elections have been declared free and fair by international observers, if one can investigate, there is always shocking founding showing that underground so called democratic policies and institutions, human rights and especially freedom of expression has been denied to citizens or a part of them.
For me on the Africa political scene there is two sorts of actors (players). On one hand there are those who stand and say loud what they think, and on the other those who tells you what you want to hear or see on paper but they act for their selfish interests or that of a minority group.
According to a Zimbabwean project lawyer, Media Defence Programme coordinator at the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) Lloyd Kuveya, laws exist in the Southern region; however we are short falling on its implementation.
Stressing on the situation in Zimbabwe, he says that this is mainly due to the fact that the institutions (courts) supposed to protect these rights are often weak, non independent, and biased.
President Mugabe passes to be one of the most arrogant African head of state. Compared to the“quiet” and “democrat” Joseph Kabila president of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the president of Zimbabwe has always spoken his mind at the extent to deny human right to those opposing his views.
Kuveya provided the audience composed with journalists, students and activist with facts of violations of freedom of press by the arrogant Mugabe’s government in Zimbabwe where journalists have been put in jails, newspapers and websites closed down as well as the bias of public media for the regime in place.
Commenting on the situation of press and media in DRC, Jose de Jesus, an independent journalist from the DRC living in Johannesburg said that “Kabila regime is an iceberg”. Kabila’s government has been painted as democratic since the country’s institutions are seemingly running smoothly he maintains. The government has claimed that it has put policy in place which recognising freedom of media. As result it is busting itself by the fact that the capital Kinshasa has more then 10 private independent journals and no less then 60 private TV channels broadcasting into the city.
Yet, the reality says De Jesus is that journalists are not free to write and voice what they have found. Journalists are too scared to be put in jail and lose their businesses. He said that the consequence is that most private TV channels are focus only on entertainment and music in particular while the public broadcasting Radio Tele National Congolaise (RTNC) is of evident bias to the government.
However, beside violation of freedom of press by governments in most African countries, a question of ethic journalistic is to be raised. With the international economic turmoil, media houses are facing huge challenges, a choice of either go for a public interest or pursue a market goal. In some case the market option is putting media houses in a position whereby their editorial lines privilege a profit making gain or maximizing on sponsor’s and shareholders’ value whereas the public interest option sets the service to the public as the center around which it revolves. Unfortunately many media houses hardly strike it right in this regards, especially in the DRC and Zimbabwe, write the President of CoRe Ciril Mutombo in (www.congorenaissance.org).
In conclusion, many attendants expressed their discouragement with mainstream press houses such as CNN, BBC, Africa N1, SABC, RTNC etc… and recognized the need for civil society organisations to find other venue of expression such as citizen journalism whereby citizen and community can take ownership of information.
In this regards, concerns were raised at the workshop about limitations of such alternative community journalism taking in account that in countries such as DRC or Zimbabwe internet usage is at its very early age. Although my strong view on this is that as African we should stop putting out excuses instead looking for alternative solution and asking the right questions. For me the question should not be ‘how many have internet’ but instead ‘how many can be reached by the internet’. All over Africa there is a boom of cellular phone users for example, even in areas where there are not internet places. Therefore the development of social networking such Twitter and the use of web based bulk SMS are among solutions for Africans in order to become independent from main stream medias.
Botswana Media Law Repressive - Activists
The ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) has come under the spotlight over the Media Practitioners Act, which it is argued, undermines media freedom and allows the government to regulate the media.
"In the last few months there seems to be increasing indicators of growing intolerance of free speech, such as political parties clamping down on free-speaking members and government coming down hard on critical press," says Mogopodi Lekorwe, a senior lecturer in the department of political and administrative studies at the University of Botswana.
Thapelo Ndlovu, director of the Media Institute of Southern Africa in Botswana says the law is repressive as "one cannot practice journalism in Botswana without the consent of the Media Council, whose executive committee excludes media practitioners, publishers or anybody with an interest in the media from its decision making structures."
To read the article title 'Botswana: Media Laws Stir Dissent within Ruling Party' click hereSource:<br />IPSArticle link:IFJ Calls on Moldova to Respect Press Freedom after Police Storm Media Outlet
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called upon the government of Moldova to respect basic standards of press freedom after police raided media premises.
"Basic standards of press freedom and rule of law are violated when police raid media without any mandate. We demand a proper explanation for what happened," said IFJ General Secretary Aidan White. "Moldova has poor a record of press freedom and this merely confirms the worst fears that there is little hope of improvement. This is particularly worrying in the midst of a general election campaign."
The IFJ has been told that in the morning of 25 February a group of policemen in the capital Chi?in ?u entered the headquarters of the television station Albasat TV, a member of Euronova Media Group holding which includes TV Euronova and the radio station Vocea Basarabiei. The only reason they gave was for the purpose of "conducting an investigation".
The network director Efim Bârdan was threatened after he asked the police for a warrant and to explain themselves. Police responded by threatening to call in shock troops if access was denied and the director was forced to open the access door. Once inside the police demanded staff hand over documents. The accountant Mihai Pintilie, the editor and presenter Natalia Pintilie were detained for a few hours. Police searched the newsrooms, took computers disks and left after a few hours without further explanation.
A Ministry of Interior official later defended the police action which he described as perfectly legal. He also revealed that the police intervention followed a request from a member of the public.
The IFJ fully supports the protests of its member, the Journalists' Union of Moldova, and asks for a full inquiry into the incident to find who was responsible for this "blatant abuse of press freedom."
For more information contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207
The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists in 123 countries worldwideDate published:27/02/2009

