Namibia

Namibia

  • Namibian CSO to Hold Land Indaba

    CSOs will jointly host a land workshop to review the current status of Namibia's land reform process, which they have criticised as slow and riddled with inconsistencies and allegations of corruption and favouritism.

    Uhuru Dempers of Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Republic of Namibia's Desk for Social Development (DfSD) says the conference will come up with an action plan which Government and specifically the Ministry of Lands and Resettlement will be expected to act upon.

    The organisations question the criteria and management of the two programmes, criticising the process as not pro-poor anymore, and not having the desired impact of poverty alleviation.

    To read the article titled, “Civil society to hold land indaba,” click here.

    Source: 
    All Africa
  • Call for Africa to Use ‘Adaptable’ ICTs

    The Namibian Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Joel Kaapanda, has called on African countries to continue developing print and electronic media in a manner that suits their conditions.

    Kaapanda, who believes that the exchange of ideas between African countries will result in a developed continent, states that, "If we implement the good things, we would have learnt from others then we are guaranteed of success."

    "We appreciate the advancement made by Zimbabwe in the technology and as a country we have to implement some of their programmes to develop our country."

    To read the article titled, “Namibian minister Kaapanda urges use of adaptable ICTs,” click here.

    Source: 
    All Africa
  • African Youth Day Conference 2011

    The Organisation of African Youth (OAYouth) is the youth platform for information exchange, forum for debate on African issues and a network of future political, corporate, academic, literary, religious and traditional leaders in all African contexts.

    The African Youth Day was declared and adopted by the African Union (AU) in 2006 to be commemorated on 1 November each year. It has since evolved as the most powerful platform of young people of Africa.

    OAYouth, in collaboration with Phelps Stokes and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), is hosting the ‘African Youth Day Conference 2011 (AYDAC'11)’ on 1 November 2011 in Johannesburg.

    The youth of Africa will convene at AYDAC’11 to celebrate the African Youth Day. The conference will pave way for youth to examine workable methods to improve youth unity as well as strengthen youth economic empowerment through leadership development, entrepreneurship support and agricultural transformation.

    Conference Objectives:

    • Echo the voice of ordinary young people of Africa;
    • Share information and best practices in promoting opportunities for youth encouraging youth to start new entrepreneurship initiatives;
    • Establish suitable structures for meeting the unique needs for youth business start-ups in developing economies in Africa;
    • Build lasting relationships between youth and business institutions;
    • Infuse a gender perspective and rights-based approach to policies and programs for youth;
    • Cultivate in the youth the spirit of accountability, transparency and integrity (ATI).
    Only young people of between 15 and 35 who are of nationality of any African State will qualify to apply.

    Cost: R2 430 per delegate.

    For sponsorships, exhibitions and applications, write to: info@oayouth.org.

    Enquiries: Tel: +27 73 445 4355.

    For more about The Organisation of African Youth, refer to www.oayouth.org.

    Event type: 
    Conference
    Event venue: 
    Ingwenya Country Escape, Lanseria, Johannesburg
    Event start date: 
    01/11/2011
  • State on Top of Human Rights Reporting

    Namibian Deputy Minister of Justice, Tommy Nambahu, says the delay in submitting the latest periodic reports on the realisation and protection of human rights to the United Nations Rights Council is not due to a lack of competent staff.

    Responding to a question put to the ministry by Rally for Democracy and Progress (RDP), Nambahu said the delay is as a result of insufficient human and material resources and an inappropriate internal organisational framework for multi-sectoral coordination on human rights issues.

    Namibia has a reporting obligation under seven major international human rights instruments, on which the country has submitted reports on six treaties.

    To read the article titled, “State on top of human rights reporting,” click here.

    Source: 
    All Africa
  • Right to Kill’ Must Go Now

    Namibia's National Human Rights Organisation (NAMRIGHTS) vehemently condemns the apparent blatant murder of a motorist, who was reportedly shot dead by members of the Namibian Police (NamPol) in the City of Windhoek in the small hours of Sunday morning. Human rights sources yesterday and media reports this morning indicate that NamPol members have shot and killed Mathew Shipanga (36), a Windhoek resident, who allegedly ignored a Police order to stop.

    According to the country’s main independent English daily, The Namibian, Col. Silvanus Nghishidimbwa, who is NamPol’s Crime Investigation Coordinator in the Khomas Region, explained that the fatal shooting took place when Shipanga, who was traveling in a vehicle, failed to heed Police officers’ orders to stop his vehicle.

    Section 49 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1977 (Act 51 of 1977) as amended---which is notoriously known among human rights circles as “the right to kill section”---states that, in the event that a suspect resists arrest or flees, the arresting officer may, “in order to effect the arrest use such force as may in the circumstances be reasonably necessary to overcome the resistance or prevent the person concerned from fleeing”.

    The Act also states that if the person is being arrested for a Schedule 1 offense, or if the arresting officer has reasonable ground to suspect that such an offense has been committed, and the arresting officer is unable to effect the arrest or prevent the suspect from fleeing by other means either than by killing him, “the killing shall be deemed to be justifiable homicide”.

    “However, in terms of Article 6 of the Namibian Constitution---read together with the provisions of the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)---no law may prescribe death as a competent sentence, and, further, that no executions shall take place in Namibia. Suffice is to say that the Constitution is the supreme law of the country and law implementation officials are ipso facto strictly prohibited from carrying out any executions of suspects, for whatever reasons, save in self defence. We are increasingly becoming alarmed by reports of trigger-happy Police officers as well as reports of Police brutality”, said NAMRIGHTS’ head, Phil ya Nangoloh, this morning.

    Col. Nghishidimbwa reportedly said that the fatal shooting incident is being investigated by NamPol’s Complaints and Discipline Unit (CDU). However, NAMRIGHTS is, instead, calling upon the Ministry of Safety and Security to appoint an independent commission, consisting of, among others, human rights defenders, to investigate the circumstances leading to the killing of Shipanga.

    We are also urging Parliament to urgently abolish the offensive elements of Section 49 of Act 51 of 1977 in order to avoid further unlawful killings of suspects by trigger-happy NamPol members.

    For more about NAMRIGHTS, refer to: www.nshr.org.na.
     
    To view other NGO press releases, visit: www.ngopulse.org/group/home-page/pressreleases.

     

    Date published: 
    07/02/2011
    Organisation: 
    Namibia's National Human Rights Organisation
  • NGO Launches Anti-Violence Campaign

    Women's Action for Development (WAD) has launched the Men's Action against Violence (MAAV), a countrywide programme aimed at addressing male violence against women and children in Windhoek, Namibia.

    WAD executive director, Veronica de Klerk, says that the increasing number of violent acts against women and girls, “Need to be addressed from another angle namely by educating and sensitising men and boys about this social evil".

    De Klerk states that WAD's involvement on the ground with communities during the past has revealed that many men believe violence against women is mainly an expression of anger and frustration as a consequence of their bloated egos, their frustrations due to unemployment or the fact that they have witnessed brutal physical violation and disrespect towards their mothers by their fathers as young boys.

    To read the article titled, “WAD plans to curb plague of violence,” click here.
    Source: 
    All Africa
  • When the Leadership Lost Vision, the Poor Suffer

    I share the fatherly pain in the horrible and horrible, brutal raping and guerilla-type execution of a young girl, a Grade 11 student at David Bezuidenhout School, Magdalena Stoffels. I have the same sorrowful emotion with the members of the family whose child/sister was robbed from their company. I put myself in their shoes; imagine a mother/brother/sister bid farewell to a loved one to go to school and only to be informed that, “Sorry, she is no more”. And not to find out that she got raped and had her throat cut. I understand the messages expressed by the aggrieved people who gathered at the Magistrate Court in Katutura (on 29 July 2010), including classmates, friends, students, neighbours and concerned citizens, when they emotionally shouted: “We are not safe. Give him to us! Hang him! Burry him alive! We have given enough petitions. No more petitions! Action, action! Where were you?” Minister of Gender, Equality and Child Welfare, Doreen Sioka, accompanied by her deputy, Angelika Muharukua, should understand better why the aggrieved group refused to be silenced or listen to be addressed by her. The reason being, “Where were you?” Some people may say that we should not play a blame game at this point in time because we need to be united. But, hey, how many people, especially women and children have to suffer before something is done? Take note that even the young women who were killed and their bodies were mutilated and the parts were found dumped along the road, their cases are still pending. It was very scary that the aggrieved citizens have no shoulders to cry on as the politicians in power, including President Hifikepunye Pohamba, or his officials at the State House, choose to enjoy the comfort zone in their air-conditioned rooms. Mr. President, leave the condemnation to the ordinary nation. Action, action and action! I mean, why were you ‘honorables’ not there in big numbers like the time of election campaigns when you want to be voted into power? Must we still call you our representatives or servants? I doubt it! The people wanted to see the Minister of Justice. Where was Minister Pendukeni Iivula-Iithana? Or has she not heard the sad news, maybe? Where was Prime Minister, Nahas Angula? Where was the Minister of Youth, National Services, Sports and Culture, Kazenambo Kazenambo? Where was the Speaker of the National Assembly, D. Theo-Ben Gurirab, and the MPs? And the Inspector-General of the Police, Lt. Gen. Sebatian Ndeitunga, was no where to be seen. What about the ‘Father of the Namibian Nation’ in this country? Please, we want to know before we believe in rumours that ‘you’ have gone on S&T and allowance-sponsored trips to show off their newly-acquired, bigger and flashy E-Class Mercedes-Benzes (costing N$30 million) which have just arrived from Germany! The Executive Director of the National Society for Human Rights, Phil ya Nangoloh, was there. Those who claim to love the nation and/or are the only ones who are promoting peace and stability in this country were absent. What a farce? What we have in this country is a society that is lost, a nation that has lost its unity of purpose. There is no solidarity at all. The community policing is non-existent. A neighbour or a passer-by does not give a damn to a call for help from another human being. One can hardly tell how many people are in the neighboring house, never mind the names. What about disciplining and caring for the children? A country where a life of a human being is no more respected and protected but worthless compared to a life of a goat, sheep or a cow. A goat convict can get 30 years imprisonment sentence while a killer can get away with murder. The case proceedings will continue long enough to qualify as torture to the already traumatised family. These acts of cruelty among our society should have served as a wake up call to those who are in power, politicians. Preventive measures should have been put in place to curb such criminal activities. Be very afraid that a thug can just find a safe spot where to ambush and target his victims, especially the school-going children. The environment makes it possible. The money is there in State coffers to buy school buses for schools in most urban areas. Billions of Namibian dollars are being squandered and misused in the interest of a few already wealthy individuals. We have already seen these similar crimes committed against the student who attend their classes at high institutions like Polytechnic, University of Namibia, International University of Management, etc. And what happened to a promise made by Iivula-Ithana, during the Tobias Hainyeko Constituency by-elections, that there will be free buses to transport students to and from schools if Councillor, Zulu Shitongeni, wins? The situation in Katutura and other impoverished areas of this country is just terrible. I wonder why some areas are not provided with mobile police stations and a 24-hour police patrol. No wonder, people in Windhoek are now relying on the City Police more than the Namibia of People (Nampol). Nampol is now more of an office where one goes to lay criminal charges, have the copies certified and makes police declarations. The country also lacks accurate statistics of the population, which is the reason why it is not clear whether the authority knows how many Namibians are there and how many are unemployed. And the leaders are in a state of denial of the United Nations report which discovered that 51.2 percent of the citizens are unemployed. Do we know how many qualified Namibians are unemployed? It is therefore difficult to budget for the maintenance and promotion of law and order, not to mention job creation, education and health services. In a true democracy, when violence has gone to such an extent of an intolerable level, politicians who are entrusted for ensuring the people’s safety and security are solely to blame. They can even resign voluntarily if something goes wrong under their supervision. But, alas, in Namibia they defend each other if not themselves. Poverty is rife. Take a trip and visit some areas in Windhoek such as Hakahana and Babylon. You could clearly see poverty and hopelessness in the eyes of the people. And the politicians in power knows this very well; that is why they have moved to the other side of Windhoek for their own safety and that of their children. They are more concerned about naming the street names after themselves or having their mark (identity) on State assets. As if that was not enough, they have recruited or employed the security personnel to provide them with a 24-hour protection. Their houses, offices and businesses are cordoned off by electric fences. It boils down to political, civil, socio-economic and cultural problems in our society. In Windhoek, the incidents such as violence against women and children are common. Many go unnoticed or unreported. Our citizens, just like its leaders, have become more reactionary than pro-active. Had the citizens and or the Namibian Government taken serious the 2009 Human Rights Report by the National Society for Human Rights, which was released in April, they would have understood better as to what the root cause of the problems are/is. Under the sub-headline ‘II. Analysis: General Human Security Situation 2009’, Paragraph 11, found that, “As the period under consideration [between 31 October 2008 and 10 December] drew to the end, a whole paraphernalia of crimes (which manifested itself through inter alia armed robbery, murder per se, abortion, baby dumping, infanticide, suicide, rape, gender-based violence, societal violence and burgeoning human trafficking) also gravely threatened the right to personal security of Namibian inhabitants.” By now, the situation must have gotten worse than before - out of hand! When the public looses confidence in the rule of law, lawlessness (mob justice) takes over. The murder of that 17-year old learner is just but an indicator of a deteriorating human rights situation in the country. - Steven Mvula is public relations officer at the National Society for Human Rights based in Namibia.
    Author(s): 
    Steven Mvula
  • Is Human Trafficking a Problem in Namibia?

    It is of utmost importance to, first, look at the definition of the term ‘human trafficking’. Trafficking in person or human trafficking (HT) refers to the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring, or receipt of person, by means of the threat or use of force or other form of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payment or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.

    HT invariably involves forcible movement of a person from one place to another and forcible utilisation of their services with the intention of inducting them into trade for commercial gains. The word ‘forcible’ signifies that the action is against the person’s will or that consensus is obtained by making deceptive claims and false allurements. In some cases, consensus is obtained because of the victim’s social conditioning; where the victim is not even aware that he/she is being exploited.

    The Namibia Constitution and relevant principles of international customary, humanitarian and human rights outlaw slavery and other slavery-like practices while the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 2004 (Act 29 of 2004), which was implemented only around 2009, specifically criminalises slavery and slavery-like practice such as HT servitude, forced labour, including forced prostitution and child labour as well as other exploitative practices. The Government of Namibia has put in place certain administrative mechanisms such as Nampol’s Women and Child Protection Unit (WCPU) and Ministry of Gender Equality and Child Welfare (MGECW).

    However, Namibia is among several Southern African Development Community countries suspected of having a serious HT problem. A small number of cases of HT, including instance of both labour and sexual exploitation, have been reported. The researchers have found several cases of suspected trafficking. For example, when trucks are stopped at border posts, individuals are sometimes found hidden inside. It is also important to note that HT does not only refer to cross border movements, but it also includes all coercive intra-country movements. In one intra-country case, a Walvis Bay mother reportedly ‘sold’ her teenage daughter to work as a prostitute against her will, while in one cross-border instance, a former Caprivi Chief Regional Officer is facing the wrath of the Zambian law after he was allegedly caught trafficking four children from remote village in Senanga in Zambia’s western province to Namibia.

    Currently, Namibia is facing deep-rooted social problems, such as poverty, unemployment and gender inequalities as well as discrimination of certain ethno-linguistic minorities which have continued to cause and exacerbate the country’s scourge. Female and child poverty as well as chronic marginalisation of minorities are pervasive in the country thereby creating a fertile ground for human trafficking and other abusive practices.

    Regional integration, with improved road infrastructures and modern forms of telecommunications, has led to an accelerated increase in illicit movement of people involving Namibian’s neighboring countries such as Angola, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana and South Africa. This scheme of things has turned Namibia into a hub for human trafficking, slavery and or slave-like practices. Some existing reports have also uncovered how pimps, long distance truck drivers, drug traffickers, professional prostitutes and organised crime syndicates operated between the borders of several Southern African countries.

    Furthermore, on 10 September 2009, the United States Department of Labour produced a statistical account on the prevalence of the worst forms of child labour in Namibia. According to the report, some Namibian children work in agriculture, raising or tending livestock, charcoal production and domestic service, such as house cleaning, cooking, and child care in exchange for food, shelter, and sometimes clothes and money while others as young as 12 years old are involved in commercial sexual exploitation. This indicates that the largest percentage of Namibian children is trafficked within the country for domestic servitude and to engage in prostitution.

    Finally, considering these factors, Namibia needs to decisively act in accelerating public awareness about human trafficking. There is a need to implement the preventive and curative responses aimed at empowering the most vulnerable sectors of our society in order to ensure that illicit practices would not be engaged into with impunity.

    - Steven Mvula is Public Relations and Media Liaison Officer at Namibia’s National Society for Human Rights.

    Author(s): 
    Steven Mvula
  • Steven Mvula

    Job title: 
    Public Rlations Officer
    Organisation: 
    National Society for Human Rights, Namibia
    Email: 
    stevenmvula [at] hotmail [dot] com
  • Namibian Elections: Why the Results are Disputed

    The controversy surrounding the voters’ register and a pending court case in which opposition parties dispute the outcome of the November 2009 presidential and national assembly election results in Namibia, is bad news for democracy in that country, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and for the African continent in general.

    In 2004, the opposition parties, led by the Congress of Democrats (CoD), approached the High Court to have the votes recounted. Unfortunately, the recount produced the same outcome – due to lack of human resource capacity.

    Similarly, the 2009 elections are disputed by opposition parties, led by the Rally for Democracy and Progress (RDP). These parties launched a second court case arguing that the elections be nullified, its results be set aside and/or order for a recount.

    The biggest question at the moment is whether the elections were held under free and fair conditions, or whether they were a reflection of the will of the people. No matter how you look at this problem, the following are some of the reasons to believe that the elections were not free and fair - the voters’ register is not accurate because there’s no proof that it was updated; the voters’ register contains about 90 000 Namibians who are dead; and over 50 000 voters have cast their votes even though their names are not appearing on the voter’s register.

    In addition, there are activists and opposition parties who argue that the voter registration process was flawed and might have created an opportunity for certain voters to vote twice. The Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) is empowered by the Electoral Act of 1992 to register voters using their identity cards and/or a sworn statement. Namibians who vote using sworn statements are issued with voter cards, which can be produced when voting. However, a person could register more than once at different locations since the voter’s roll is not computerised and centralised. This is one of the reasons why people’s names are duplicated on the voters’ roll.

    Despite warnings from the opposition parties and CSOs, including the National Society for Human Rights (NSHR), that the voters’ register was flawed, the ECN went ahead to have it gazetted. In fact, the NSHR observer status was withdrawn and later lifted when the organisation went to court, arguing that the ban was illegal because there was never a hearing before the decision was made, as required by the law.

    Lack of punitive measures on the code of conduct for political parties also makes it impossible for politicians to play by the rules. The current code of conduct is nothing but a ‘gentlemen’s agreement’ because it is not part of the Electoral Act. This is one of the reasons why placards and political party colours were visible in some of the polling stations during the elections. And no action has ever been taken against politicians or members of political parties who violate the code of conduct. It will be in the interest of Namibia and Africa in general for the electoral code of conduct to be legalised.

    What role did SADC, African Union, European Union (EU) and other observers played during the elections? What made all these observers to conclude that the elections were free and fair? Clearly they did not do their homework properly. They must be embarrassed wherever they are for declaring the elections free and fair even when they knew that certain problems existed prior the polls. Are they impartial when declaring whether the elections were free and fair? Are some of these observers, the EU in particular, pursuing certain agendas against certain African countries?

    We stand tall in arguing that the November 2009 elections were not free and fair and that they never reflected the will of the people of Namibia. There’s no smoke without fire. An interesting example is the Okatyali constituency in the Oshana region where 2 000 votes were casted in an area with a population of 2 000 people. This is a 100 percent voter turnout, which means even the underage children voted.

    It is therefore premature for SWAPO Party’s secretary-general, Pendukeni Iivula-Ithana, to urge political party officials to prepare themselves to take up their parliamentary duties while there is a pending court case. Maybe some of us are interested in knowing how she plans to clean up the mess, including putting systems in place to enable the country to hold free and fair elections in future. ECN and SWAPO Party have all confirmed that ‘administrative/human errors’ were committed, so, there were problems.

    The Department of Home Affairs & Immigration also does not have a plan in place to help the ECN to update the voter’s roll.

    The ECN initially announced that 1.3 million people registered to vote. The announcement soon became a laughing matter when the ECN revised the number to 1.1 million and then to 900 000. Activists and political analysts argue that the number of voters exceeded the number of those who appear in the voters’ roll.

    Some of the lessons we learned are that the ECN should be independent in a true sense, the voter’s register should be computerised and centralised and that the National Planning Commission should work together with the ECN, using the updated population register. Why is the ECN only allowed to function when the country prepares for elections? Does the ruling SWAPO Party take democracy serious or not?

    Only free and fair conditions make free and fair elections possible; only free and fair elections can produce credible results; only credible and binding elections can produce a legitimate government; and only a legitimate government can guarantee conditions of peace and stability.

    - Steven Mvula is public relations officer at the National Society for Human Rights and Butjwana Seokoma is information coordinator at SANGONeT.
    Author(s): 
    Steven Mvula
    Author(s): 
    Butjwana Seokoma
Syndicate content