Exclusive Breastfeeding Within a Social Context - Reflecting on Africa

Wednesday, September 16, 2009 - 13:20
Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of a child’s life is not only a matter of concern for those working in the HIV and AIDS sector. While the benefits of breastfeeding are known, for many women this is simply not an option. Social norms and practices, programmes which ‘dump’ milk formulae in poor communities to relieve poverty and hunger and other factors all contribute to a complex social environment which affects women’s choice to breastfeed or not

Comments

Moms should be acquainted how important breast-feeding is. It provides a lot of health benefits as compared to the commercial milk that are sold in the market. There are some reason why breast-feeding should be practiced by most moms. Breast-feeding helps protect the baby against diarrhea cough, cold, malnutrition other common illnesses. It is always available at no cost. It helps babies grow up with close bond to their mother. It may be worth a cash loan to educate moms with the importance of breast-feeding.

Dear all, please also see the following article on the latest research on breastfeeding in the African context, published by IRIN on 31 August 2009:

http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=85939

Charlotte Sutherland

I am an HIV positive female (desclosed to a few), and gave birth to an HIV negative (handsome) boy last year July 2008. From birth was advised to exclusively formula feed to minimise the risk of HIV infection, although i did wonder what it felt like to breast feed and being african, my family frowened upon the decision not to breastfeed, and could not explain the full recourse of my situation. I was excited when an article in one of our employee wellness site posted that exclusive breast feeding does minimise transmission from mother to infant, and Mark is right, i wish Charlotte could have further expored breast feeding and the issue of HIV transmission thereof. Lucky for me i do fall under the wealthy black and i could afford the formula route and i could attest to the fact that formula did remove all risk of transmission for my son after delivery. But it is not enough to just say "exclusively breast feed" withiout addressing the transmission issue more deepely and what would ultimately be in the best intrest of the mother and the child. Ms T

Mr Colvin

The above piece does not skirt around the issue of HIV transmission, but focuses on breastfeeding as a practice that benefits mothers and babies in more ways than one. In other words, breastfeeding can not only lower risks of HIV transmission, but also serve as a valuable food source for babies in impoverished  contexts. Of course the fact that these impoverished contexts even exist is a matter of utmost concern, but it is also a reality, and while academics are trying to rectify the world's inequalities, millions of babies become HIV infcted because a) their mothers cannot afford formula milk, and b) they don't understand/agree with the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding.

So even though exclusive formula feeding can prevent babies from contracting HIV, in reality this is sadly not possible for many women, as you note. Yes, we need to address this, but right now, we also need to try and prevent those babies from contracting HIV, right? So while we can try to provide formula milk to all the women who need it, how will such an initiative run parralel to and integrate with the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding? Is it not exactly the intermittent provision of formula to mothers that causes so many babies to become HIV infected? I think formula needs to be provided consistently, so as to enable mothers to exclusively formula-feed, otherwise they have to jump from breastfeeding to formula feeding, and when the formula is finished, back to breastfeeding again.

The piece I wrote aims to illuminate the micro context in which many African women live their daily realities and argues that social contexts, whatever their nature may be, play an important role in mothers' decision-making and babies' feeding. It furthermore argues that, in contexts where exclusive formula-feeding is currently not possible (read: not funded) exclusive breastfeeding is a vital life-saving strategy to be practiced now in order to save future generations.

 

Charlotte Sutherland

 

I find it very disturbing that an article can be written about breastfeeding in Africa but skirt around the issue of HIV transmission. Charlotte suggests that exclusive breastfeeding can lower the risk of transmission but neglects to state that exclusive formula feeding can remove any risk of transmission after delivery. Why is she not concerned about issues of equity? Why is it only white and wealthy black women who are HIV positive who should be able to feed their infants safely? We all talk about equity when it comes to access to ARVs but when it comes to safe infant feeding by HIV positive women, we are only too happy to tell "them" to exclusively breast feed. Sure there are many circumstances where, tragically, it is probably safer for HIV+ mother to breastfeed because of lack of access to safe water etc. but this is something that we need to address. Mark Mark Colvin Maromi Health Research Inthuthuko Building (2nd Floor, HSRC), 750 Francois Rd, Durban, 4001 Private Bag X07, Dalbridge 4014 Tel: +27 (0)31 2425413 | Fax: +27 (0)31 2425401 Fax to email: +27 (0)862707320 | Cell: +2
The importance of breastfeeding is easily overlooked or argued away by non-scientific arguments. The fact is, however, that breastfeeding is intimately related to our present and future, through its vital connection to the state of the continent’s health. The breastfeeding of infants not only holds several health benefits to the infants themselves, but is also an important variable to consider from a long-term perspective. The practice is vital to the future of the continent, notably because it has been shown that exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of a baby’s life can protect the baby from contracting HIV.

Most health centres and clinics recommend to new mothers that they practice exclusive breastfeeding for at least the first six months of infants’ lives in order to maximise the infants’ immune systems. This instruction seems easy enough to follow, but the social context in which these mothers live often deviates significantly from the clinical setting. The general upbringing of infants, including breastfeeding and other health concerns, are not issues simply and single-handedly determined by mothers. This month’s newsletter argues that against the background of Augusts World Breastfeeding Week, breastfeeding is not only a health and HIV and AIDS related issue, but also a gender issue insofar as it concerns mothers, the role played by families and surrounding environments and circumstances in mother’s decision making.

World Breastfeeding Week is celebrated annually from 1 - 7 August and serves as a period during which organisations and Governments work to create awareness about the importance of breastfeeding. The celebration commemorates the Innocenti Declaration made by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) policy makers in August 1990 to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. Yet, despite almost 20 years of promotion and awareness, less than 50 percent of African mothers practice potentially lifesaving exclusive breastfeeding. In Cameroon, for example, the current breastfeeding rate is a meagre 24 percent (Cameroon Tribune, 18 August 2009).

The benefits of breastfeeding


So, why is breastfeeding so important when a variety of formulae exist that can perform a seemingly identical function? According to the WHO, there are several important reasons for a mother to breastfeed for at least the first six months of her infant’s life. First, mother’s milk contains all the nutrients the infant needs. Particularly in resource-limited settings, powdered formula is often diluted too much in order to ‘stretch’ supplies, a strategy that sadly reduces the nutrients the infant receives. Formula may also contain contaminations present in the water used. Mother’s milk is usually readily available and safe for infants to drink, and obviously far more affordable than formula. “Besides being clean and hygienic, mother's milk is ready for consumption and at the right temperature, the mother does not need to buy it, and the more she breast-feeds the more milk she will produce,” explains Mozambique’s Lidia Chongo, Head of the Women and Child Health Department. She launched a year-long ‘National Campaign to Promote Breast-Feeding’ in August as part of the Government’s efforts to promote exclusive breastfeeding. Against the background of worldwide increasing poverty and famine, breastfeeding is certainly a viable alternative to formula milk.

Besides these benefits, the fact that breast milk boosts infant immune systems also means that it protects babies from contracting HIV, if practiced exclusively. If mothers breastfeed in addition to feeding their baby’s formula and/or solid foods, the babies are at a far higher risk of contracting HIV. Thus, although many African mothers breastfeed their infants, the fact that so few exclusively practice this feeding method puts thousands of infants at risk of contracting HIV from their mothers. The consequences are not only reduced quality of life for mother and child, but also reduced wellbeing of the African continent as a whole. Why do so few mothers practice exclusive breastfeeding?

Breastfeeding in the social context
As noted, clinics and health centres advise mothers to breastfeed exclusively for at least the first six months of their babies’ lives. However, when mothers arrive home, several other factors come into play. First, in the African context, mothers are usually not the sole decision-makers when it comes to their children. Grandmothers play an important role in the mothers’ and infants’ lives and are said to have a strong influence over what mothers feed their babies. In Burkina Faso, for example, grandmothers are reported not to approve of exclusive breastfeeding (‘The path to mother's milk is paved with kola nuts’ Irin News, 4 August 2009).

According to D. Marc Sawoudogo, a nurse and director of the village clinic in Zincko, Kaya health district, 100 km northeast of the capital, Ouagadougou, grandparents are the “real” decision makers when it comes to child care. “Children do not belong to only their parents in African society,” she told IRIN. “Here, the grandparents take the babies as soon as they get home and dismiss the parents as if to say, 'Who do you think you are?' It is the old ladies who block exclusive breastfeeding from taking root,” she stated. It is not clear why grandparents disapprove of exclusive breastfeeding, and programmes to address this issue have not been as effective as hoped.

Low levels of involvement by fathers and other community members in infant care is another reason why the advice of health centres is discarded. The absence of men and youth groups from the issue of caring for infants has been identified as a contributing factor to the low numbers of women who breastfeed. In Cameroon, the Minister of Public Health, André Mama Fouda, launched a campaign to promote breastfeeding during last month’s World Breastfeeding Week. Fouda’s campaign urged men and youth groups to become more involved in raising infants in their communities. It is hoped that more involvement of these groups will help to spread the message of the importance of exclusive breastfeeding.

Supporting mothers

Breastfeeding is not a miracle solution to poverty and famine. Hunger and poor nutrition affects mothers and in turn, their milk and their babies. Programmes that empower women financially and generate incomes for communities thus remain absolutely essential, not only for the mothers, but for the children they are raising, too. However, many programmes reportedly ‘dump’ formula on communities in efforts to relieve their poverty and hunger, but experts have warned that formula is a bad substitution for breast milk. Providing famine communities with formula discourages exclusive breastfeeding, and therefore can technically worsen the situation, without the correct information.

Mothers need healthcare support, too. The WHO describes breastfeeding as something that needs to be learnt. New mothers need proper instruction from healthcare workers as well as family encouragement, as they have to deal with nipple pain, tiredness and fears that they will not produce enough milk for the baby. If mothers do not feel that the way their infant is fed is an important health and community matter, they may see no reason to breastfeed their babies exclusively for six months or longer.

While breastfeeding is vital to the future of Africa, both in terms of coping with food shortages and building healthy, HIV-free generations, the practice should not be conceptualised as existing independently of women’s social contexts. Welfare dumping of formula milk, cultural and communal beliefs and healthcare shortcomings may all contribute to maternal reluctance to practice exclusive breastfeeding. In light of the urgency that underlies the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding, campaigns need to take note of the influence of women’s social contexts so that programme efficiency can be significantly improved.

- Charlotte Sutherland is Research Manager: Gender Issues in Africa at Consultancy Africa Intelligence (charlotte.sutherland@consultancyafrica.com). The September edition of the Gender Issues in Africa Newsletter is republished here with permission from Consultancy Africa Intelligence (CAI), a South African-based research and strategy firm with a focus on social, health, political, and economic happenings in Africa. For more information see http://www.consultancyafrica.com or http://www.ngopulse.org/press-release/consultancy-africa-intelligence. Alternatively, visit http://www.consultancyafrica.com/promo2 to take advantage of CAI’s free, no obligation, three-month trial to the company’s Standard Report Series.
Author(s): 
Charlotte Sutherland

Add Comments

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Twitter-style @usersnames are linked to their Twitter account pages.
  • Twitter-style #hashtags are linked to search.twitter.com.

More information about formatting options