Double Jeopardy: Female and Foreign in South Africa

Wednesday, June 3, 2009 - 12:11
A year has passed since the xenophobic attacks in Alexandra left 62 people dead, at least 670 wounded, dozens of women raped, and at least 100 000 displaced. Horrific images and reports in the media reflected a country in crisis. A new report explores the gendered nature of xenophobia in South Africa and the impact of such xenophobia on migrant women

Related articles


Like they say in law, ingnoranta lawsuit nemene excusair, ignorant of the law is not an excuse, the citizens of south africa a taking laws into their hands without hte law prevailing, were is the law system,were is trhe judiarcial system, were is the ligistlative arm of govermnet and were is the executive i think the arm of government makes the country to be a country of ruls and regualtions, why are there laws abiding citizens here, why are citizen taking laws into their hands, without allowing the government fighting for the right of the citizens, the arm of government needs to sit down and make a concreted bodies, in a laitn maxim it was said ignoranta nemene facit excusair, ignoirant of the fact is not an excuse,i no the apethied is responsible for these behaivoral acts of citizens but the government must no that the law sysment belongs to the citizen and the government per say, why is there xenophibic act,why will south african hates their fellow african brothers,was african the course of apethied ? but we the african country werent left, we stood for these nations to see he lite of independant and freedom,the nigerai nationality supported with alot of financies, health,weapons, investment, habour south african into our homesthe childrens in schools paid south african development fills, as well with other nations, zimbabwe helped in all these categories as well, so why wiil south african per say hate the black foreign national here,i think the government system needs to play a vital role in these case becoause you the government can not wacth poeple been killed everyday, humilated destroyed porpeties. no is unfiar, because south africa his damaging their reputaions and dignity which need to be giving back to these great nation,the government need to set up forum on how to educate these citizen oabout foreidn nationals,human rigth activist should be ste up, and also awarness promthly,education, enlightenment,breaking nthe minds of people to oneness with the foriegn national here,i think with these we can make a good impact, ltes stop dicentralising each ohers.south africa must wake up from thes apethied embackgun and face the true story of reality,they must wake and stop being unfair to blabk nationality here in south africa, they must wake and given excusies is about the apethied, i believe all african countries wants experinece the stolen of right and freedom, and we overcome and conquered.lets love each other as one and african, noting can change,i ask one questions if all african countries beging to conarve and figth these nations i think south africa,will no be south africa,lets see our selve has brothers and sisters, lets help each other, and provide for each other,i rest my case here, please i need these to be publsh and tell people of south africa to face the reality of life and stop viruses of apithied, a past memory as an injury to all.bourton
i think race my suggestion to this that the south arican government is a not a good helping governtmnet about these issues, let me start form saying?i still got alot of question to ask the government about we foriegn national here in south africa,1. i want to ask the government about we the nigerian, i could remember that becos we are lovely brother you care abouth our brohers we ask to pay south africa development fee during the apithied, and all other country as well,we accompanated alot south africans in our various neighnouring countries i will say the government systems in south africa is porus and anoying to we the foriegners here, the government have to generate systematic way on how to deal with this xenophobic attck towards forieghners.we cared for these nations when they neede cared, we cared for these nations when they wanted help, we cared for these nations when they needed support to fight the bowers i.e the ducth, why will south african sees we the foreingn national has to nobody, they humiliate us, why,i have alot to ask the government questions, please we need to trash the issues amicably, my name is bourton,am a lawyer please i will like to recieve a xcall about these.0710252661
Issues related to race will always be seen as taboo topics in a country with painful history of racial discrimination and segregation like South Africa. Nevertheless, a search for durable solution must overcome the fear of asking sensitive questions.

Personally, I do think “xenophobia” is a weak-general qualification of what happened in May 2008. The term Xenophobia typically used to describe a fear or dislike of foreigners seems for me inappropriate in this case. It seems as if we are scared to point fingers and emphasise that only “black” foreigners from other African countries were subjected to killing and violence. Reports have shown that expatriates of other race were not concerned. Pushing further, some human right organisations have even suggested that we should scrutinise here a case of “attempt of genocide” bearing in mind that organised mobs were running after other national groups.

It’s still difficult to other foreign Africans to understand how brothers and sisters of this country could kill so easily their fellows. Wilkipedia, define Xenophobia as a dislike and/or fear of that which is unknown or different from oneself. To wonder the margin of difference between a black South African from a fellow black African compared to Chinese, Indians and white? This is unconceivable! The killing of a human being no matter his colour or origines should never be tolerated.

It is regrettable that the South African government never done enough to inform and address adequately such hatred and inhuman behavior. Therefore, it won’t be a surprise for me that the history repeats its self very soon now that the economy is in recession and huge job losses have been predicted.

We must all voice the need for justice and reparation for 62 African families who have lost their siblings and thousands displaced. There is no doubt that if such bad behavior toward foreign Africans is not addressed efficiently, it will stain forever on how citizens of this country are viewed by other fellow Africans.

How worth is it to win the esteem of the whole world if you lose that of your brothers and sisters?

South Africans are wonderful people in general. Let all residents in this country work at keeping such a good reputation and respect human rights.

A year has passed since the xenophobic attacks in Alexandra left 62 people dead, at least 670 wounded, dozens of women raped, and at least 100 000 displaced. Horrific images and reports in the media reflected a country in crisis.

“The first attack, 11 May 2008, that resulted in 2 deaths and 40 injuries. Migrants from Malawi, Mozambique and Zimbabwe were targeted.

Some shacks and a vehicle were set alight in the Ramaphosa informal settlement on Saturday morning, Gauteng police said.

A Mozambican man has been burned alive by a mob during disturbances near the South African capital Pretoria.”
– (Source:

Just over a year later, local newspaper Sowetan, reports that “xenophobic attacks are rising amongst foreign nationals in the Western Cape”. Are we to expect a repeat of the last years’ xenophobic violence? What has changed since last year? Do South African citizens still feel that African migrants living in their midst are taking their jobs, housing and women and/or being involved in crime?

For women a double jeopardy exists - their gender and nationality makes them more susceptible to violence. Compounding this is that women who are foreign nationals have less recourse and protection than South African women, thus making them more susceptible to aggressive sexual behaviour.

On Friday, 29 May 2009, the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) launched the findings of a study in a report entitled ‘The Gendered Nature of Xenophobia in South Africa’ at Constitutional Hill in Johannesburg.

The main objective of the study was to explore the gendered nature of xenophobia in South Africa and the impact of such xenophobia on migrant women. The study was conceptualised, designed and implemented before the May 2008 xenophobic attacks in recognition of the fact that xenophobia was a particular form of gender-based violence.

Data was collected through interviews conducted with a sample of 155 respondents from Zimbabwe, Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Rwanda, Somalia, Uganda and Nigeria. Eighteen of the women had left their country of birth because of ethnic violence or war. Twenty-six of the women have children, ranging in numbers from one to six: at least four of the women were separated from some or all of their children. A major concern for the women who had brought children to South Africa is the impact of xenophobia on them. The women interviewed spoke of how their children were threatened or attacked at schools because they were foreigners

Commenting on the findings, CSVR Executive Director, Adele Kirsten observed that the roles women occupied in their home countries during the conflict they fled ie that of protecting their children and supporting communities – remained intact in the country of their refuge.

The study found that as traditional bearers of culture, the issue of identity and belonging is a distinctly gendered problem for women migrants. Maintaining a sense of identity is usually done through cultural dress, food, music and rituals. However, doing so also impedes integration into a new community as this distinguishes them from the rest of the population, thus making them vulnerable to xenophobic abuse.

Duncan Breen of the Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa (CoRMSA) argued that gendered xenophobia must be considered the same as racism, sexism, homophobia and other acts of intolerance towards others, as it is a daily experience for many migrant women. These women are not able to gain access to services such as health, transport or housing, and struggle to access the criminal justice system. “Women are thus targets for gender-based violence because they aren’t documented and cannot report incidences to the police,” Breen said.

Analysts of the May 2008 attacks, found the competition for resources between migrants and poor South Africans to be one on the leading reasons for the violence. According to the CSVR, this is true in relation to the general causes of xenophobia towards foreign women, with jealousy from South Africans over migrant women’s accommodation and/or employment linked to xenophobic attitudes and behaviours.

In light of the findings of the study, the CSVR has made a number of specific recommendations to reduce the xenophobia experienced by women migrants. These include:
  • Establish local community and neighbourhood based education and awareness campaigns;
  • Create space for cultural exchange in schools;
  • Locate anti-xenophobic posters in taxis, taxi ranks, bus depots, buses, train stations and trains;
  • Create business partnerships between South African and foreign women;
  • Include foreign/migrant representatives on community structures to enable them to have access to decision-making bodies;
  • Inform migrant women on how to access public services;
  • Conduct capacity building and training with public service providers to educate them on working with women from different cultures;
  • Create a transparent complaint process for the Department of Home Affairs and public hospitals
  • Create a set of legal standards and guidelines for all public services so as to legally enforce equal treatment of foreigners and locals.
Also responding to the May 2008 attacks, the International Migration Organisation made a number of recommendations in a research report titled, ‘Towards Tolerance, Law, and Dignity: Addressing Violence against Foreign Nationals in South Africa’ – please provide link to this / or to more information about it. These include:
  • Develop interventions to promote accountability and counter a culture of impunity;
  • Criminal prosecution on its own will not be enough. Resources and mechanisms should be put in place to encourage existing civil society organisations to support the rights and welfare of non-nationals;
  • Promote positive reforms to build inclusive local governance structures;
  • Open up more channels for legal migration;
  • Support government to address xenophobic and discriminatory practices in public institutions;
  • Promote a human rights culture among the people of South Africa;
  • Conduct ongoing, systematic inquiries into anti-immigrant and anti-outsider violence and the political economy of township life;
  • Recognising the difficulties of achieving the reforms outlined above, Government should work together with international organisations (eg, IOM, UNHCR, OCHA) and civil society to develop early conflict and disaster warning and management systems;
  • Sensitise and capacitate media to undertake responsible reporting on migrants and migration issues.
While the recommendations in both studies are important in addressing the situation, migrant women living in South Africa still find themselves victims of physical violence, verbal and psychological abuse, structural and institutional violence, and cultural and ethnic discrimination.

As Duncan Breen concluded his presentation, “If we don’t deal with daily incidences of xenophobia, then it’s likely that there’ll be no changes on a large scale.”

Nicolle Beeby is the programme assistant to SANGONeT’s Civil Society Information Programme.
Nicolle Beeby
Nicolle Beeby